Generalized Inductive Definitions in Constructive Set Theory
نویسنده
چکیده
The intent of this paper is to study generalized inductive definitions on the basis of Constructive Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory, CZF. In theories such as classical ZermeloFraenkel Set Theory, it can be shown that every inductive definition over a set gives rise to a least and a greatest fixed point, which are sets. This principle, notated GID, can also be deduced from CZF plus the full impredicative separation axiom or CZF augmented by the power set axiom. Full separation and a fortiori the power set axiom, however, are entirely unacceptable from a constructive point of view. It will be shown that while CZF + GID is stronger than CZF, the principle GID does not embody the strength of any of these axioms. CZF + GID can be interpreted in Feferman’s Explicit Mathematics with a least fixed point principle. The proof-theoretic strength of the latter theory is expressible by means of a fragment of second order arithmetic. MSC:03F50, 03F35
منابع مشابه
Non-deterministic inductive definitions
We study a new proof principle in the context of constructive ZermeloFraenkel set theory based on what we will call “non-deterministic inductive definitions”. We give applications to formal topology as well as a predicative justification of this principle.
متن کاملInduction-recursion and initial algebras
Induction-recursion is a powerful definition method in intuitionistic type theory. It extends (generalized) inductive definitions and allows us to define all standard sets of Martin-Löf type theory as well as a large collection of commonly occurring inductive data structures. It also includes a variety of universes which are constructive analogues of inaccessibles and other large cardinals belo...
متن کاملPROOF THEORY OF MARTIN - LÖF TYPE THEORY . AN OVERVIEW 1 Anton SETZER
We give an overview over the historic development of proof theory and the main techniques used in ordinal theoretic proof theory. We argue, that in a revised Hilbert’s programme, ordinal theoretic proof theory has to be supplemented by a second step, namely the development of strong equiconsistent constructive theories. Then we show, how, as part of such a programme, the proof theoretic analysi...
متن کاملOn the Constructive Content of Proofs
This thesis aims at exploring the scopes and limits of techniques for extracting programs from proofs. We focus on constructive theories of inductive definitions and classical systems allowing choice principles. Special emphasis is put on optimizations that allow for the extraction of realistic programs. Our main field of application is infinitary combinatorics. Higman’s Lemma, having an elegan...
متن کاملAn Inductive Version of Nash-Williams' Minimal-Bad-Sequence Argument for Higman's Lemma
Higman’s lemma has a very elegant, non-constructive proof due to Nash-Williams [NW63] using the so-called minimal-bad-sequence argument. The objective of the present paper is to give a proof that uses the same combinatorial idea, but is constructive. For a two letter alphabet this was done by Coquand and Fridlender [CF94]. Here we present a proof in a theory of inductive definitions that works ...
متن کامل